Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Surgery ; 172(3): 989-996, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1852108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal inguinal hernia repair timing remains controversial. It remains unclear how COVID-19 related elective surgery cancellations impacted timing of inguinal hernia repair and whether any delays led to complications. This study aims to determine whether elective surgery cancellations are safe in pediatric inguinal hernia. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study at 14 children's hospitals included patients ≤18 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair between September 13, 2019, through September 13, 2020. Patients were categorized by whether their inguinal hernia repair occurred before or after their hospital's COVID-19 elective surgery cancellation date. Incarceration and emergency department encounters were compared between pre and postcancellation. RESULTS: Of 1,404 patients, 604 (43.0%) underwent inguinal hernia repair during the postcancellation period, 92 (6.6%) experienced incarceration, and 213 (15.2%) had an emergency department encounter. The postcancellation period was not associated with incarceration (odds ratio 1.54; 95% confidence interval 0.88-2.71; P = .13) or emergency department encounters (odds ratio 1.53; 95% confidence interval 0.94-2.48; P = .09) despite longer median times to inguinal hernia repair (precancellation 29 days [interquartile range 13-55 days] versus postcancellation 31 days [interquartile range 14-73 days], P = .01). Infants were more likely to have the emergency department be their index presentation in the postcancellation period (odds ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.31; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Overall, COVID-19 elective surgery cancellations do not appear to increase the likelihood of incarceration or emergency department encounters despite delays in inguinal hernia repair, suggesting that cancellations are safe in children with inguinal hernia. Assessment of elective surgery cancellation safety has important implications for health policy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hernia Inguinal , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Hernia Inguinal/complicaciones , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(7): 1391-1397, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1670804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with liberal reimbursement policies, resulted in increased use of video conferencing (hereby described as telehealth) for patient care. To better understand the impact on pediatric surgeons and their patients, we surveyed members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) regarding telehealth use prior to and during the pandemic. METHODS: An iteratively developed survey was sent to all active, non-trainee surgeons within APSA during March 2021. RESULTS: Of 247 responses (23% response rate), 154 (62%) began using telehealth during the pandemic. In addition to the 101 (60.5%) respondents who felt telehealth had a positive impact on their clinical practice, 161 (74.2%) felt that it had a positive impact on their patients' satisfaction. The most common barriers to telehealth use prior to COVID-19 were availability of technology (39.3%), patient access to technology (36.0%), and lack of reimbursement (32.0%). These barriers became less substantial during the pandemic. Most respondents (95.3%) indicated they would continue using telehealth post-pandemic if it remains appropriately reimbursed. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatric surgeons implemented telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and endorsed a positive effect on their clinical practice as well as on patient satisfaction. An overwhelming majority would continue using this technology if reimbursement policies remain favorable.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/métodos , Estados Unidos
3.
Am Surg ; : 31348211047456, 2021 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1435154

RESUMEN

Intussusception is the most common cause of bowel obstruction in infants four to ten months old and is commonly idiopathic or attributed to lymphoid hyperplasia. Our patient was a 7-month-old male who presented with two weeks of intermittent abdominal pain associated with crying, fist clenching and grimacing. Ultrasound demonstrated an ileocolic intussusception in the right abdomen. Symptoms resolved after contrast enemas, and he was discharged home. He re-presented similarly the next day and was found to be COVID-19 positive. Computed tomography scan demonstrated a left upper quadrant ileal-ileal intussusception. His symptoms spontaneously resolved, and he was discharged home. This suggests that COVID-19 may be a cause of intussusception in infants, and infants presenting with intussusception should be screened for this virus. Additionally, recurrence may happen days later at different intestinal locations. Caregiver education upon discharge is key to monitor for recurrence and need to return.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA